USPTO serial 87166338
ENDERMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENDERMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marc Cullen Goldsen
MARC CULLEN GOLDSEN DAVIS MILES MCGUIRE GARDNER, PLLC40 EAST RIO SALADO PARKWAY, SUITE 425TEMPE, AZ 85281UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Aloe vera derivative used as a raw ingredient in the manufacture of cosmetics in the nature of leave-on skin care applications, skin creams, facial creams, sun creams, skin lotions, ointments, styling gels, aftershave, skin moisturizers, moisturizing creams, moisturizing body lotions, and color cosmetics, such as foundations, lipsticks, lip pencils, lip glosses, mascaras, eye shadows, eyeliners, concealers, blushes, blushers, bronzers and palettes, and rinse-off skincare applications, shampoos, conditioners, shaving creams, skin cleansers, woven skin wipes, non-woven skin wipes, bath gels, shower gels, body washes and soaps for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 8, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 31, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2018 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 9, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 5, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |