Drawing for RGT

USPTO serial 87168204

RGT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CORNWELL, ANDREA B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RGT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Trevor P. Schmidt

TREVOR P. SCHMIDT HUTCHISON, PLLC3110 EDWARDS MILL ROADSUITE 300RALEIGH, NC 27612

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Biological preparations for use in microbe sporulation other than for medical, pharmaceutical or veterinary purposes; germination catalystsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 5, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 5, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 3, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 3, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 3, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 3, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 8, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 8, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Apr 2, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 14, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 14, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 14, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 14, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 9, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Aug 9, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 9, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 25, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 25, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 24, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 19, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 15, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance