USPTO serial 87169049
INSIGHTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INSIGHTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAY LYN SCHWARTZ
KAY LYN SCHWARTZ GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLPIP SECTION2021 MCKINNEY AVENUE SUITE 1600DALLAS, TX 75201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical frames | ACTIVE | Aug 12, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 2, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 2, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2017 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |