Drawing for SUAVECITO

USPTO serial 87169173

SUAVECITO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODWIN, KATRINA JOYE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUAVECITO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cathryn A. Berryman

CATHRYN A BERRYMAN WINSTEAD PCPO BOX 131851DALLAS, TX 75313UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Paper towels and bath tissuesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 4, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 4, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 23, 2018EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 13, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 13, 2018RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Feb 13, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 2, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 22, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 22, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 22, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 21, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 21, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2016TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Sep 26, 2016PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance