Drawing for QPC

USPTO serial 87170857

QPC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5309354Status 702Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 17, 2017
Examiner
NUNLEY, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 117

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with QPC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,446*

Plus Government fees of $2,600

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John C. Cain

John C. Cain Munck Wilson Mandala, LLP1330 Post Oak Blvd., STE 2850Houston, TX 77056United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electronic controllers for operating automated lubrication equipmentACTIVE—
037Installation and servicing of automated lubrication systemsACTIVE—
040Custom fabrication of automated lubrication systemsACTIVE—
042Design of automated lubrication systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2026REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 27, 2023NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 27, 2023C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 24, 2023EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
May 23, 2023PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
May 23, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 8, 2022E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2022REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 1, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 12, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance