USPTO serial 87171515
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Chilliwack, BC, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas B. Thompson
DOUGLAS B. THOMPSON THOMPSON COOPER LLPSUITE 201, 1007 FORT STREETVICTORIA, BC, V8V3K5CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electric light dimmers; electrical control systems for lighting systems; fluorescent lamp ballast for electric lights; fuses for lighting control panels; light conducting filaments; light dimmers; light diodes; light emitting diodes; light switches; lighting ballasts; lighting control panels | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | ceiling lights; electric night lights; electric torches for lighting; electric track lighting units; fluorescent lighting fixtures; halogen light bulbs; led light bulbs; led luminaires; light bulbs; light diffusers; light globes; lighting diffusers; lighting fixtures; luminaires; miniature light bulb | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |