Drawing for RECONCEPT TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 87172130

RECONCEPT TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOINER, KATINA JACKSON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RECONCEPT TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ellen A. Rubel

ELLEN A. RUBEL MOORE & VAN ALLEN PLLC3015 CARRINGTON MILL BOULEVARDSUITE 400MORRISVILLE, NC 27560

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals used in industry, science and photography, as well as in agriculture, horticulture and forestry except fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, parasiticides; unprocessed artificial resins, unprocessed plastics; manures; fire extinguishing compositions; tempering and soldering preparations; chemical substances for preserving foodstuffs; tanning agents for use in the manufacture of leather; adhesives used in industryACTIVE—
002Paints, varnishes, lacquers; preservatives against rust and against deterioration of wood; colorants; mordants for use in the manufacture of protective coatings; raw natural resins; metals in foil and powder form for painters, decorators, printers and artistsACTIVE—
007Machines, namely, gas turbines, steam turbines and engine compressors; motors and engines except for land vehicles; machine coupling and transmission components except for land vehicles; incubators for eggs; automatic vending machinesACTIVE—
040Treatment of materials for custom manufacturing of turbomachines, namely, gas turbines, steam turbines, compressorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 6, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 7, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 18, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 23, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 21, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 21, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 21, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 21, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance