USPTO serial 87172390
FUELOSOPHY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FREEMAN, BREANNA SHALEISE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FUELOSOPHY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL A. LEE
PAUL A. LEE PEPSICO, INC.3A-421PLANO, TX 75024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | SNACK FOODS BASED ON FRUITS, VEGETABLES, LEGUMES, NUTS AND SEEDS; YOGURT; SNACK FOOD DIPS; MILK-BASED BEVERAGES WITH A HIGH MILK CONTENT; SOY-BASED BEVERAGES USED AS A MILK SUBSTITUTE; CONCENTRATES, SYRUPS OR POWDERS FOR MAKING SUCH MILK-BASED BEVERAGES WITH A HIGH MILK CONTENT AND SOY-BASED BEVERAGES USED AS A MILK SUBSTITUTE | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | READY-TO-DRINK COFFEE; COFFEE-BASED DRINKS; READY-TO-DRINK TEA; TEA-BASED DRINKS; CONCENTRATES, SYRUPS OR POWDERS FOR MAKING SUCH DRINKS; CRACKERS; CHOCOLATE; READY-TO-EAT, CEREAL-DERIVED FOOD BARS; GRAIN-BASED SNACK FOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | SOY-BASED BEVERAGES NOT BEING MILK SUBSTITUTES; OAT-BASED BEVERAGES WITH MILK OR FRUIT JUICE NOT FOR FOOD PURPOSES; SOFT DRINKS; FRUIT JUICES; FRUIT DRINKS; DRINKING WATER AND FLAVORED DRINKING WATER; CONCENTRATES, SYRUPS OR POWDERS FOR MAKING SOY-BASED BEVERAGES NOT BEING MILK SUBSTITUTES, OAT-BASED BEVERAGES WITH MILK OR FRUIT JUICE NOT FOR FOOD PURPOSES; SOFT DRINKS, FRUIT JUICES, FRUIT DRINKS, AND FLAVORED DRINKING WATER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE CONCENTRATE MANUFACTURING COMPANY OF IRELAND
- Other trademarks owned by THE CONCENTRATE MANUFACTURING COMPANY OFIRELAND
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named FUELOSOPHY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 14, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 2, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 2, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 6, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |