USPTO serial 87174048
SMARTMELTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 2, 2017
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SMARTMELTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chantilly, VA, US
Chantilly, VA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory M. Stone
Gregory M. Stone WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, LLPSEVEN SAINT PAUL STREETBALTIMORE, MD 21202-1636UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic monitoring and control systems for use with industrial furnaces, comprised primarily of radar-enabled sensors and computer software for radar imaging and computer tomography; electronic sensing, measuring, monitoring and control systems for determining the thickness of refractory or insulating material used in industrial furnaces, comprised primarily of radar-enabled sensors and computer software for radar imaging and computer tomography; remote electronic monitoring and control systems for determining the presence of molten material within a refractory or insulating material used in industrial furnaces, comprised primarily of radar-enabled sensors and computer software for radar imaging and computer tomography; remote electronic leak detection systems for identifying a leakage of molten material in industrial furnaces, comprised primarily of radar-enabled sensors and computer software for radar imaging and computer tomography; electronic inspection, measuring, monitoring, control, and reporting systems for predicting maintenance and remaining operational life of industrial furnaces, comprised primarily of radar-enabled sensors and computer software for radar imaging and computer tomography | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Electronic inspection, measurement evaluation, monitoring, and reporting of thickness, density, dielectric permittivity, and conductivity properties of molten, refractory, and insulating materials in furnaces for industrial purposes, using radar-enabled sensors and computer software for radar imaging and computer tomography | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2023 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 19, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 2, 2023 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 25, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |