Drawing for FIRE FRONT

USPTO serial 87174791

FIRE FRONT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIRE FRONT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Duane M. Byers

Duane M. Byers Nixon & Vanderhye PC901 N. GLEBE ROAD, 11TH FLOORARLINGTON, VA 22203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance system to support emergency first responders and military operations comprised primarily of disposable micro sensors for sensing environmental factors, a pneumatic micro sensor launcher in the nature of an observation rocket, an integrated communications datacenter architecture, a digital flat panel display screen with an integrated Geographic Information System (GIS) display with an overlay of the environmental/situational data generated by the micro sensors, and also including unmanned aerial vehicles and ground robots for dispensing the micro sensors; Miniature deployable remote sensing devices consisting of sensor, receiver, transmitter, battery, computer hardware, and proprietary software, all for use in hazardous environments and military operations and capable of providing location and movement data, environmental data, weather conditions, chemical/biological/radiation hazards, which can be integrated into a GIS (Geographic Information System) displayACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 12, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 18, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2020EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 1, 2020EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 1, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 28, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2020EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2020EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 26, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 3, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 31, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 31, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 19, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 16, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 14, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 6, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 9, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 2, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 2, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 2, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 2, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 30, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 30, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance