USPTO serial 87175183
PÓCIMA DE RAPUNZEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PASSMAN, NICOLE A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PÓCIMA DE RAPUNZEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
The Woodlands, TX
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | 3-in-1 hair conditioners; 3-in-1 hair shampoos; Hair bleaches; Hair care creams; Hair care lotions; Hair care preparations; Hair cleaning preparations; Hair colouring and dyes; Hair colouring preparations; Hair conditioners; Hair creams; Hair decolorants; Hair dressings for women; Hair dyes; Hair fixers; Hair gel and hair mousse; Hair gels; Hair lotion; Hair lotions; Hair mousse; Hair mousses; Hair nourishers; Hair oils; Hair rinses; Hair rinses; Hair shampoo; Hair spray; Hair sprays; Hair sprays and hair gels; Hair straightening preparations; Hair styling gel; Hair styling preparations; Hair styling spray; Hair texture cream; Hair tonic; Hair tonics; Hair-washing powder; Cosmetic hair dressing preparations; Non-medicated hair serums; Oils for hair conditioning; Preparations for setting hair; Styling foam for hair | ACTIVE | Dec 4, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2017 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2017 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2017 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 5, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | EPEN | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |