USPTO serial 87175198
EXPERIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EXPERIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven R. Gursky, Mary L. Grieco, Safia A. Anand
STEVEN R. GURSKY, MARY L. GRIECO, SAFIA A. ANAND OLSHAN FROME WOLOSKY LLP1325 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, conducting parties, showing films, presentation of films, exhibition of films, conducting film festivals, provision of cinema facilities, film projection services; cinema and theatre services, namely, cinema theaters; cultural activities, namely, organization of cultural shows; music, video and film entertainment services, namely, hosting musical and film events; cinema presentations, namely, provision of cinema facilities; organizing, producing, arranging and curating entertainment, recreational, educational and cultural events, namely, organization of exhibits for musical entertainment, showing films, and hosting art exhibits; entertainment services provided by way of blogs and online entertainment forums featuring information regarding films and music; entertainment services provided by way of podcasts; provision of web based programs for mobile communications devices, being non-downloadable media, multimedia, audiovisual media, games and publications; entertainment services by way of music and media provided through the internet or mobile telephone communication, namely, non-downloadable music and films; provision of on-line electronic non-downloadable publications from the Internet, namely, blogs and articles in the field of films, cinema, music and entertainment; production, preparation, exhibition, distribution and rental of video, audio, audiovisual and radio programs and of films, animated films, sound and video recordings and live events, including through interactive media, including on the internet; provision of podcasts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 25, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |