Drawing for SPIN CHEF

USPTO serial 87175584

SPIN CHEF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPIN CHEF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L. Doughty

JOHN L. DOUGHTY DOUGHTY LAW, L.L.C.42 CREEKSIDE CTACWORTH, GA 30101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Electric cooking pots; Electric fryers; Electric grills; Electric skillets; Electric slow cookers; Electric deep fryers; Electric indoor grills; Electric panini grills; Deep fryer, electric; Deep fryers, electric; Deep fat fryers; Industrial deep fryers; Multi-purpose, electric countertop food preparation apparatus for cooking, baking, broiling, roasting, toasting, searing, browning, barbecuing and grilling food; Oil-free electric fryers; Programmable electronic devices for setting temperatures and cook times which also feature recipes, sold as a component of gas cooking ovens, electric cooking ovens and electric deep fryersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 25, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 23, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Oct 23, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Oct 23, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 26, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 24, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 24, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Apr 24, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 25, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 23, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 23, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 23, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 25, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 23, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 23, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 23, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 24, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 29, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 29, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 9, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jul 24, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 24, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 24, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 22, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 16, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 27, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 23, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 22, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance