USPTO serial 87176498
PRECISE VISUAL TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 18, 2017
- Examiner
- KEAN, AMY C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with PRECISE VISUAL TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Owner
BORTON-LAWSON HOLDING COMPANY, LLC
WILKES-BARRE, PA, US
Other trademarks owned by BORTON-LAWSON HOLDING COMPANY, LLC
Borton-Lawson Holding Company, Inc.
Wilkes-Barre, PA, US
Other trademarks owned by Borton-Lawson Holding Company, Inc.
Borton-Lawson Holding Company, Inc.
Wilkes-Barre, PA, US
Other trademarks owned by Borton-Lawson Holding Company, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MaryJo Kishel
MaryJo Kishel ROSENN, JENKINS, & GREENWALD, LLPCross Creek Pointe, 1065 Highway 315Suite 200WILKES BARRE, PA 18702Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Laser scanning services, namely, full or partial three dimensional and two dimensional laser digital scanning services; Computer modeling services, full or partial; Survey scanning services, in the form of digital scanning of structures; Computer graphics services, namely, the provision of two dimensional and three dimensional site plans; Computer graphics services, namely, customized client workflow process services; Technical surveying, namely, provision of visual and photo documentation and remote measurements of structures and buildings; Topographical surveying, namely, provision of visual and photo documentation and remote measurements of land; Gathering, analysis and evaluation of structure and/or building survey data for detection of issues related to structural, mechanical and electrical components and systems | ACTIVE | Mar 29, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BORTON-LAWSON HOLDING COMPANY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Borton-Lawson Holding Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Borton-Lawson Holding Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PRECISE VISUAL TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2023 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 15, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 15, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2017 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2017 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |