USPTO serial 87177828
DRYPAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NOVAKOVIC, MIROSLAV
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DRYPAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Soderman
TAUENTZIENSTR 9-12BERLIN, 10789GERMANYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Anti-oxidant food supplements; Pesticides, namely, chemical preparations for pesticidal purposes; Vermin destroying preparations; Disinfectant dressings in the nature of disinfectants; Food supplements; Dietary supplements and dietetic preparations, namely, dietetic foods containing reishi mushrooms and moringa oleifera adapted for medical use; Medicated compresses; Nutraceuticals for use as a dietary supplement; Sanitary wear, namely, sanitary pants; Sanitary preparations for medical purposes; Hygienic preparations and articles, namely, disinfectants for hygienic purposes; Compresses for use as medical dressings; Materials for dressings, namely, gauzes; Medicated food supplements; Dressings, medical; Mineral food supplements; Mineral dietary supplements for humans; Mineral salts for medical purposes; Cleaning cloths impregnated with disinfectant for hygiene purposes; Preparations for destroying vermin; Dietary supplemental drinks; Nutritional supplements; Absorbent sanitary articles, namely, sanitary towels; Panty liners; Synthetic material for use in setting bones, namely, bone void fillers consisting of synthetic materials; Dressing retention materials, namely, wadding for dressings; Medical dressings, coverings and applicators used to cover and treat wounds | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | Non-medicated compresses | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | Chemical processing equipment, namely, chemical sterilization units; Mobile drying apparatus, namely, heat drying apparatus for chemical processing; Personal heating and drying implements, namely, hand and hair dryers; Toilet seats with automatic sanitary cover replacement before use; Drying apparatus and installations, namely, food drying machines; Desiccating apparatus, namely, drying machines for agriculture; Water treatment apparatus, namely, gravimetric dry flow feeders for water treatment; Smoke drying units, namely, food drying machines; Drying shelves used to control temperature and humidity for heating and proofing food goods; Drier cabinets used to control temperature and humidity for heating and proofing food goods | ABANDONED | — |
| 019 | Building glass | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LUTOR trading & distribution Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by LUTOR trading & distribution Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named DRYPAK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 18, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |