Drawing for TIC'M OFF NATURAL INSECT REPELLENT

USPTO serial 87178093

TIC'M OFF NATURAL INSECT REPELLENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIC'M OFF NATURAL INSECT REPELLENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dennis Ford Eagan,

DENNIS FORD EAGAN FINNERAN & NICHOLSON PC30 GREEN STREETNEWBURYPORT, MA 01950UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Insect repellents comprised of entirely organic ingredientsACTIVEJun 14, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 16, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 16, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 16, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 10, 2018EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 15, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 15, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 16, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 16, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 16, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 22, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance