USPTO serial 87178903
V-LINE SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KENEALY, NATALIE LANGFORD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with V-LINE SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew D. Dorisio
ANDREW D. DORISIO KING & SCHICKLI, PLLC800 CORPORATE DRIVE, SUITE 200LEXINGTON, KY 40503UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal cladding for construction and building; Metal wall systems comprised of architectural panel systems for use as exterior building cladding; Metal interior wall panels, metal exterior wall panels, metal ceiling panels, metal roofing panels, metal wall tiles, metal threaded slide fasteners, metal threaded snap fasteners, metal threaded stud fasteners, metal threaded fasteners, metal soffits; Pre-fabricated interior and exterior wall assembly kits, of metal comprised of metal wall panels and fasteners; Metal rainscreen cladding for construction and building and metal construction facade rainscreen systems comprised of metal wall panels and metal fasteners | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing instruction services in the field of installation of metal cladding and rain screen cladding | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2019 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |