Drawing for CONDO CULTURE

USPTO serial 87178921

CONDO CULTURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONDO CULTURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Claire Zopf

CLAIRE ZOPF Z IP LAW PLLC1015 ELM STREET SUITE 201MANCHESTER, NH 03101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed publications, namely, newsletters, hand-outs, magazines and maps in the field of real estateACTIVE—
035Advertising real estate listings of othersACTIVE—
036arranging of leases and rental agreements for real estate; real estate valuation; real estate brokerage; real estate consultancy; Real estate services, namely, the lease and rental of residential and commercial real estate, condominiums, lofts and apartments; and real estate agency services relating to the purchase and sale of residential and commercial real estate, condominiums, lofts and apartmentsACTIVE—
037consultations and information services about temporary and permanent interior and exterior home renovation; consulting services in the field of condominium renovationACTIVE—
041Providing on-line digital publications in the nature of internet newsletters in the field of real estateACTIVE—
042Interior design services; interior decorating; consultation and information services in the field of home staging, namely, consultations and information about temporary and permanent interior and exterior home decoration; consulting services in the field of condominium interior decoratingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 27, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 7, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2019FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Jul 19, 2019ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jul 17, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 26, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2019GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2019GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2019CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 6, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 6, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 24, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 25, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 25, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 18, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 28, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance