Drawing for VITAHEMP

USPTO serial 87179206

VITAHEMP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HETZEL, DANNEAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VITAHEMP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Myers

Nicholas D. Myers THE MYERS LAW GROUP4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 200Newport Beach, CA 92660UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee-based beverages; Coffee; Tea-based beverages; Tea; all of the aforementioned goods containing hempACTIVE—
032Bottled water; Soda pops; Soda water; Soft drinks, namely, sodas; Water beverages; all of the aforementioned goods containing hempACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 14, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2020EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 3, 2020EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 3, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 13, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 1, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 18, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 16, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 28, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 12, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 30, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 26, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 8, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 13, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 24, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 3, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 27, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 21, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 17, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 17, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 11, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance