USPTO serial 87179548
CUTJACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPALE, LISA ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CUTJACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anna Vishev
ANNA VISHEV LAW OFFICE OF ANNA VISHEV PC44 CORTELYOU AVENUESTATEN ISLAND, NY 10312UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Knives, knife sharpeners, knife sheaths, machetes, knife bags, knife holders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 9, 2018 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 4, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |