USPTO serial 87180717
CLAUDIA.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ASKEW, MEGAN RUTH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLAUDIA.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Grant Morton
Jonathan Grant Morton Morton & Associates LLP246 West BroadwayNew York, NY 10013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, pants, coats, dresses, tops and bottoms; footwear; headwear; swimwear; sportswear, namely, athletic shorts, athletic pants, athletic shirts, athletic uniforms; leisurewear, namely, robes, night gowns, leisure suits, leisure shoes, loungewear | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication access services; communication services in the nature of electronic transmission of voices; electronic transmission of data; communications services, namely, transmission of data by means of the internet; electronic transmission of images, photographs, graphic images and illustrations over a global computer network; electronic transmission of data, audio, video and multimedia files via a global computer information network; simulcasting broadcast television over global communication networks, the Internet and wireless networks; provision of telecommunication access to video and audio content provided via an online video-on-demand service; satellite communication services; telecommunications gateway services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2020 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |