Drawing for HTL

USPTO serial 87181264

HTL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PAINTER, VALERIYA SHERMAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HTL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle Kaiser Bray

MICHELLE KAISER BRAY KAR AUCTION SERVICES, INC.13085 HAMILTON CROSSING BLVD.CARMEL, IN 46032UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Locksmithing services, namely, custom programming of transponder keys, remote keys, high security keys, remotehead keys, smart keys and proximity keysACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 20, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 5, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 5, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 5, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 29, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 17, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 17, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 17, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 17, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 17, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 22, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 2, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 29, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance