Drawing for TAANSA

USPTO serial 87183264

TAANSA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHANG, KATHERINE S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TAANSA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard Y. Kim

RICHARD Y. KIM MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP500 NORTH CAPITOL STREET, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Conducting business research, business analysis and consulting in the fields of business organizational communication, business communication, human resources and business project management; designing and implementing business information and business project management campaigns to facilitate business organizational communication, business communication, human resources and business project management; business services, namely, business consultation and business management; business management consulting and advisory services; business consulting services in the field of corporation communications; organization of business conventionsACTIVE—
041Arranging and conducting classes, seminars and workshops in the fields of corporate communication, organizational communication, business communication, human resources and project management, and distribution of course materials in connection therewith; providing non-downloadable online publications in the nature of books, brochures, newsletters and manuals in the field of corporate communication, organizational communication, business communication, human resources and project managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 31, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 23, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 23, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 23, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 28, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 3, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 22, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 22, 2017ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 25, 2017PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 5, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance