Drawing for TICAUTO

USPTO serial 87184489

TICAUTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TICAUTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lin Xiao

Lin Xiao YOUNG BASILE HANLON & MACFARLANE P.C.3001 W. BIG BEAVER ROADSUITE 624TROY, MI 48084-3107

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Data processing apparatus; Computer peripheral equipment; Computer software for navigation, speech recognition, semantic analysis, search, text-to-speech, network management, weather and traffic, instant messaging, on-board entertainment, making phone call; Computer software for in-vehicle use and connected cars; Smartglasses; Smart watches; Wearable activity trackers; Smartphones; Audio-video receivers; Electronic book readers; CamerasACTIVE—
042Research of technology in the field of connected cars, navigation, speech recognition, semantic analysis, search, text-to-speech, network management, weather and traffic, instant messaging, on-board entertainment, making phone call; New product exterior design for industrial products; Computer software design; Consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; Updating of computer software; Provision of Internet search engines; Monitoring of computer systems by remote access to ensure proper functioning; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for connected cars, navigation, speech recognition, semantic analysis, search, text-to-speech, network management, weather and traffic, instant messaging, on-board entertainment, making phone call; Cloud computing featuring software for use in connected cars; Cloud computing featuring software for navigation, speech recognition, semantic analysis, search, text-to-speech, network management, weather and traffic, instant messaging, on-board entertainment, making phone call; Information technology consulting servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 15, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 2, 2020GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2020GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2020CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 28, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 28, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 28, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 28, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 28, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2020ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2019GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2019GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2019CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 21, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 20, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 20, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 20, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 17, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 17, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 16, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 15, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 15, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 15, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 7, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 2, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 5, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 5, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 5, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 4, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 3, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 10, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance