Drawing for BROOKLYN HEIGHTS SODA CO.

USPTO serial 87184568

BROOKLYN HEIGHTS SODA CO.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRODY, DANIEL S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - MANAGING ATTORNEY

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BROOKLYN HEIGHTS SODA CO.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy J. Zarley

TIMOTHY J. ZARLEY ZARLEY LAW FIRM, P.L.C.400 LOCUST STREETCAPITAL SQUARE, SUITE 200DES MOINES, IA 50309-2350

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Soft drinks, namely, sodasACTIVEFeb 28, 2017
043Restaurant services, namely, providing of food and beverages for consumption on and off the premisesACTIVEFeb 28, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 27, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 27, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2017CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2017SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 4, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 11, 2017IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 11, 2017EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 11, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 14, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 6, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 26, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 26, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 26, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 21, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance