USPTO serial 87184767
THE CORE OF INTELLIGENCE "GROUND"
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5934804Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 17, 2019
- Examiner
- MAJCHER HARTNETT, MEGAN K
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE CORE OF INTELLIGENCE "GROUND"?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Aichi-pref., JP
Aichi-pref., JP
Aichi-pref., JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Geoffrey D. Aurini
Geoffrey D. Aurini HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C.5445 CORPORATE DRIVESUITE 200TROY, MI 48098Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; Prerecorded magnetic data carriers featuring information in the automotive field, compact discs containing map data and programs for car navigation systems, DVDs containing map data and programs for car navigation systems; Electric mechanisms for coin-operated apparatus; Cash registers, calculating machines, data processing equipment, computers; Computer software recorded on data media for use in controlling vehicle functions and for use in analyzing and diagnosing problems in vehicle performance, all of the foregoing to ensure optimal vehicle performance; computer software recorded on IC chip for use in controlling vehicle functions and for use in analyzing and diagnosing problems in vehicle performance, all of the foregoing to ensure optimal vehicle performance; computer software downloaded from a remote computer network, for use in controlling vehicle functions and for use in analyzing and diagnosing problems in vehicle performance, all of the foregoing to ensure optimal vehicle performance; Electric controlled fire-extinguishing apparatus; Accelerometer for airbag system and suspension control system for vehicles; Airbag electronic control unit for vehicles in the nature of an electronic satellite sensor; Electronic controller for vehicle airbags; Brake fluid pressure sensor for vehicles; Cam position sensor for vehicles; Common rail pressure sensor for vehicles; Computers for automatic air-conditioners for vehicles; Computers, namely, electronic control units; Coolant temperature sensor for vehicles; Crank position sensor for vehicles; Crash sensor for vehicles; Electronic controller for vehicle driving assistance; Electronic control unit for charging hydrogen for fuel cell vehicles; Electronic control unit for controlling the operation of hybrid vehicles; Electronic power steering control unit; Electric relays; Electric switches; Electric valve actuators; Emission control computer for vehicles; Electronic engine control units for vehicles; Exhaust gas pressure sensor for vehicle engines; Electronic Fuel injection control unit for motorcycles; Inertia sensors, namely, sensors to control stability of vehicles; Integrated circuits; Multiplex body electronic controller for vehicles; Piezoelectric sensor for vehicles; Power control unit for hybrid and electric vehicles; Pressure sensor for fuel cell vehicles; Processors, namely, central processing units; Electronic remote security control unit for vehicles; Seatbelt electronic control unit; Semi-conductors; Smart electronic control unit for remote vehicle access, remote engine start and vehicle systems operation; Sonar electronic control unit; Speed sensor for vehicles; Electronic variable gear-ratio steering control unit for land vehicles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2026 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 17, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 13, 2019 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 30, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |