USPTO serial 87185248
UNDERSTAND YOUR NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UNDERSTAND YOUR NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Berkeley, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heather Dunn
HEATHER DUNN DLA PIPER LLP555 MISSION STREET; SUITE 2400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2933UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for monitoring, analyzing, summarizing, filtering, altering, or reporting network traffic; computer hardware and software for detecting, reporting, blocking, or eliminating malicious network traffic, viruses, worms, malware, spyware, unauthorized software and network attacks; computer hardware and software for providing digital security; computer hardware and software for monitoring compliance, analysis, event correlation and threat responses in the fields of cybersecurity and forensics; computer peripherals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Provisioning and maintenance of online non-downloadable computer software for computer security and prevention of computer risks; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems or improving performance; computer security services, namely, providing analysis, monitoring and analyzing network traffic, detecting attacks, inspecting traffic, and logging activity; monitoring the computer systems of others for technological purposes and providing backup computer programs and facilities; providing virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Corelight, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Corelight, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named UNDERSTAND YOUR NETWORK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 28, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 8, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2017 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |