Drawing for SHANTOU BAHALI HAIKEE BEEF HOTPOT

USPTO serial 87186141

SHANTOU BAHALI HAIKEE BEEF HOTPOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PATEL, SAMIR RAMESH
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHANTOU BAHALI HAIKEE BEEF HOTPOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric P. Gros-Dubois

ERIC P. GROS-DUBOIS EPGD BUSINESS LAW777 SW 37th AvenueSuite 510Miami, FL 33135

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Beef; Beef bouillon; Beef slices; Beef stew; Beef stock; Beef tallow; Prepared beef; Roast beefACTIVE—
035Retail stores featuring beef and beef related food productsACTIVE—
043RestaurantACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 5, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 3, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 3, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 14, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 31, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 29, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 29, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 29, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 29, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2017CHPNPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT – NOT ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2017APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 12, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 8, 2017EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 13, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 13, 2017ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 13, 2017PBERWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Sep 5, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 8, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 10, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 9, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance