Drawing for SIRIUS ONETOUCH

USPTO serial 87186763

SIRIUS ONETOUCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRISCH, HANNA CHO
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - SENIOR ATTORNEY

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIRIUS ONETOUCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PAMELA B. HUFF

PAMELA B. HUFF SCHWEGMAN LUNDBERG & WOESSNER, P.A.P.O. BOX 2938MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Technical consultation services in connection with computer hardware, computer software, and computer networking equipment, namely, computer consultation; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware, software, and networking problems, none of the foregoing services related to website design, development, or hostingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 1, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 22, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 22, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 13, 2021EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 3, 2021GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2021GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2021CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 8, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2021ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2021EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 4, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 4, 2021EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 8, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 8, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 8, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 14, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 12, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 16, 2019CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2019EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Aug 22, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 31, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 18, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 17, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 22, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 21, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 17, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 16, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance