Drawing for DIILI

USPTO serial 87186910

DIILI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHEN, ELIZABETH S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIILI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sylvia Mulholland

SYLVIA MULHOLLAND LAW OFFICE OF SYLVIA MULHOLLAND1450 2ND ST STE 110SANTA MONICA, CA 90401UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Hermetic compressors for refrigeration, parts, fittings, pieces, accessories being parts of hermetic compressors and components thereof; sealed units in the nature of sealed compressors for refrigerators and parts, pieces, fittings, and components thereofACTIVE—
011Refrigeration apparatus, namely, refrigeration condenser and sealing units as part of condensers and structural and replacement parts, pieces, fittings and components thereofACTIVE—
035Business management, namely, inventory management of refrigeration equipment, asset management services in the nature of reporting on service histories, end of product life information, and replacement costs of refrigeration equipment; business management of commercial logistics for others; advertising and marketing services, namely, promoting the commercial products for others through computer hardware and software in connection with refrigeration equipmentACTIVE—
037Installation, maintenance and repair of refrigeration equipment by means of a software as a service (SAAS) serviceACTIVE—
042Services related to technology solutions through the application of Internet of things (IoT), namely, designing and developing computer hardware and software and artificial intelligence for controlling, monitoring, evaluating and managing of refrigeration equipment of networks comprised by physical objects embedded with electronics in the nature of refrigeration equipment, using software, sensors, and network connectivity, which enables these objects to collect and exchange data; Cloud computing featuring software for use in corrective maintenance and equipment diagnoses of refrigeration apparatus, monitoring equipment energy efficiency, identifying best location for sales, equipment tracking, quality analysis and predictive maintenance for refrigeration apparatus; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in inventory management of refrigeration equipment, for use in corrective maintenance and equipment diagnoses of refrigeration apparatus, monitoring equipment energy efficiency, identifying best location for sales, equipment tracking, quality analysis and predictive maintenance for refrigeration apparatusACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 3, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 30, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 4, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 23, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 23, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 20, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2018GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 29, 2018GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 29, 2018CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 25, 2018ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 16, 2018PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 2, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 27, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 23, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 27, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 27, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 12, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 11, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 11, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance