Drawing for .SUCKS

USPTO serial 87187215

.SUCKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with .SUCKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT M O'CONNELL JR

ROBERT M O'CONNELL JR ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP2050 MAIN ST, SUITE 1100IRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Domain registry operator services related to the gTLD in the markACTIVEMay 21, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 12, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 11, 2022ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 11, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 11, 2022CTDACT DECISION: AFFIRMED—
May 11, 2022CTDACT DECISION: AFFIRMED—
Oct 29, 2020EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 12, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 3, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 1, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 1, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 10, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 10, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 10, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 8, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance