USPTO serial 87187268
BEST-IN-CRAFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEST-IN-CRAFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer technology support services, namely, help desk services; Computer services, namely, providing an interactive web site featuring technology that allows users to collect, store, manage, deliver and showcase electronic and paper-based content; Electronically tracking and monitoring computer chips worn by sporting participants using computer technology; Outsource service providers in the field of information technology; Planning, design and management of information technology systems; Providing technology consulting in the field of social media; Providing a secured-access, members only website featuring technology that gives members the ability to access content, pay dues, register for events; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables internet users to book travel; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables internet users to share documents, images and videos; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables users to create a chronological schedule of events; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables users to request and record ideas, suggestions, and comments from other users in any field of business or general interest; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables users to promote and manage event related activities; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to organize and manage postmarked e-mails; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to promote and manage event related activities; Providing a website that gives computer users the ability to market, display content, collect submissions, interact with customers, email market; Providing an interactive website featuring technology that allows users to promote and manage event related activities; Providing an online non-downloadable Internet-based system application featuring technology enabling users to offer content, documents, images, videos and other media to promote and manage events | ACTIVE | Sep 13, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |