USPTO serial 87187732
INTERVENTIONAL ORTHOPEDICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTERVENTIONAL ORTHOPEDICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher Rajotte
CHRISTOPHER RAJOTTE FUERST ITTLEMAN DAVID & JOSEPH, PL1001 BRICKELL BAY DRIVE, SUITE 3112MIAMI, FL 33131UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Charitable fundraising services, namely, raise funds to further the understanding and development of medical procedures involving orthobiologic cell-based treatments which act therapeutically by augmenting and stimulating the body's capacity for self-repair, and to provide assistance to those who could benefit from such procedures | ACTIVE | Jan 27, 2015 |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, making grants, conducting and organizing research, seminars, and conferences, and distributing related written materials in furtherance of the understanding and development of medical procedures involving orthobiologic cell-based treatments which act therapeutically by augmenting and stimulating the body's capacity for self-repair | ACTIVE | Jan 27, 2015 |
| 042 | Research services, namely, facilitating research into and development of medical procedures involving orthobiologic cell-based treatments which act therapeutically by augmenting and stimulating the body's capacity for self-repair, including the maintenance of a patient registry database accessible by researchers of such procedures | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Interventional Orthopedics Foundation
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INTERVENTIONAL ORTHOPEDICS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |