Drawing for VALUESMITH HANDCRAFTING VALUE STORIES S

USPTO serial 87187769

VALUESMITH HANDCRAFTING VALUE STORIES S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VALUESMITH HANDCRAFTING VALUE STORIES S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sara J. Epstein

SARA J. EPSTEIN SJE LAW520 BROADWAY, SECOND FLOORSANTA MONICA, CA 90401UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Brand development and evaluation services in the field of healthcare, including the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device industries; Business consultation and management regarding marketing activities and launching of new products; Business services provided to the healthcare industry, namely, the collection, reporting, and analysis of healthcare quality data for business purposes; Marketing consultation in the field of pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical devices; Promoting collaboration within the scientific, research and provider communities to achieve advances in the field of healthcare, including the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device industries; Providing economic consultation in the field of health outcomes research based on information gathered from healthcare providers, physicians, patients, payers (e.g., insurance companies) and policy makers for the purpose of assisting pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device companies in understanding the value of a given productACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 12, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 13, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 13, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 24, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
May 10, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 2, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 28, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 28, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 16, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 3, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 5, 2016MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Oct 4, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 3, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance