USPTO serial 87188327
GATEWAY BRIDAL & PROM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FALK, ERIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GATEWAY BRIDAL & PROM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Salt Lake City, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rachel Jacques
RACHEL JACQUES MASCHOFF BRENNAN1389 CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 300PARK CITY, UT 84098UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry; Tiaras | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2009 |
| 025 | Dresses; Formal wear, namely, dresses and gowns; Wedding and bridal dresses and gowns; Prom and homecoming dresses and gowns; Mother of the bride dresses and gowns; Quinceanera dresses and gowns; Couture wedding and bridal dresses and gowns; Bridesmaids dresses and gowns; Couture bridesmaids dresses and gowns; Veils; Shoes; Petticoats | ACTIVE | Aug 12, 2009 |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring dresses; formal wear, namely, dresses and gowns; veils; shoes; petticoats; jewelry; tiaras; On-line retail store services featuring dresses; formal wear, namely, dresses and gowns; veils | ACTIVE | Aug 12, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |