USPTO serial 87188902
RITAVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, GEORGE WILLIAM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RITAVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ho Chi Minh City, VN
Ho Chi Minh City, VN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joe McKinney Muncy
Joe McKinney Muncy Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.4000 Legato Road Suite 310Fairfax, VA 22033UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Paving tiles; Floor tiles of wood; Floor tiles, not of metal; Rubber and synthetic non-metal tiles for use on indoor and outdoor floors; Tiles of clay, glass, gypsum, ceramic or earthenware; Bricks; Fired bricks; Fireplace bricks; Semi-refractory bricks, not of metal; Unfired bricks; Tiles, not of metal, for building; Tile floorings, not of metal; wooden flooring; wooden floor boards; building materials, namely, brick earth used for making bricks; Glass mosaics for use in building construction; Mosaic art tiles made of marble; Mosaics made of natural stone and stone tile; Non-metal swimming pools | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Cabinets; tables; chairs; beds; kitchen cabinets; lounge chairs | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee; Tea; Cocoa; Sugar; Tapioca; Palm flour; Coffee substitutes; Flour; Cereal-based snack food; Processed cereal-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack food or ingredient for making other foods; Confectionary, bonbons made of sugar; Confectionery, namely, pastilles; Ice cream; Honey; Golden syrup; Baking powder; salt; Vinegar; Barbecue sauce; Condiment, namely, oyster sauce; Food seasonings; Condiment, namely, pepper sauce; Soya bean paste; Pimiento used as a condiment; Frozen yoghurt; Sherbets | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring clothing, skirts, footwear, headgear for wear, garments, imitation leather, animal skins, pelts, chests, suitcases, valises, umbrellas, canes, transport vehicles, automobile accessories, benzine, metalwares, refrigerators, washing machines, blender machines, juicer machines, air conditional, flat irons, microwave ovens, fans for personal use, gas stoves, electric stove, agricultural products, food, interior décor goods, sanitary, construction materials, machines industrial machines and installations, namely, Cutting machines, lathes, glue pump, drilling machines, planing machines, crane, sanding machines, current generators, electronic scale, timekeeper machine, shredder machine, band sawing machine, agricultural and fishery machines, household appliances, namely, knife, scoops, forks, cups, bowls, plates, hygienic paper, flooring cleanser, dishwashing detergent, brooms, dustpan, mop, fashion garments, cosmetic, coffee, cigarette, construction equipment, specialized vehicles, motorcycle, accessories, high-class sanitary demonstration and other goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurants; cafeterias; cafés; hotels; rental of temporary accommodation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RITA VO COMPANY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by RITA VO COMPANY LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named RITAVO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 9, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 26, 2017 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |