Drawing for FS CARD INC.

USPTO serial 87189229

FS CARD INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FS CARD INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark J. Liss

MARK J LISS LEYDIG VOIT & MAYER LTDTWO PRUDENTIAL PLAZA STE 4900180 N STETSON AVECHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Credit card payment processing services; credit card transaction processing services; credit card authorization services; issuance of credit cardsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2019MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 1, 2019ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 1, 2019OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 1, 2019OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 20, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2017OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 24, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 8, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 14, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance