Drawing for AERO TRAILERS

USPTO serial 87189277

AERO TRAILERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NUNLEY, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AERO TRAILERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Derek A Hawkins

Derek A Hawkins Hawkins IP757 North Water StreetSuite 300Milwaukee, WI 53202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012TrailersACTIVESep 30, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2019PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Dec 4, 2018PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Dec 4, 2018APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 23, 2018APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 15, 2018APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 1, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 1, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2018ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 20, 2018PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 3, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 26, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 13, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 13, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 23, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 31, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 31, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2017GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2017GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2017EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Jan 11, 2017CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jan 9, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance