Drawing for MONGOOSE

USPTO serial 87189363

MONGOOSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONGOOSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John C. Stringham

John C. Stringham WORKMAN NYDEGGER60 EAST SOUTH TEMPLE, SUITE 1000SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008manually operated pump for injecting lubricants, sealants and cleaners used in the gas and oil pipeline industryABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 25, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 12, 2018MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 11, 2018MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 11, 2018ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 11, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 11, 2018EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
May 21, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 21, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 21, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 17, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 5, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 22, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 13, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 13, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 13, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 27, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 14, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 14, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 14, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 9, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance