Drawing for CLOUD10

USPTO serial 87189874

CLOUD10

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CLOUD10?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Oleg A. Mestechkin, Esq.

Oleg A. Mestechkin, Esq. Mestechkin Law Group PC2218 Ocean AvenueBrooklyn, NY 11229United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Household linen; Linen for household purposesACTIVEMar 15, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 15, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 15, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 20, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 20, 2018UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Aug 30, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 30, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 25, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2018CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 6, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 5, 2018SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jan 5, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 5, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Dec 1, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Nov 30, 2017IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Nov 30, 2017TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Nov 30, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Nov 30, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Nov 30, 2017EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 20, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 20, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 18, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 30, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Apr 18, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 21, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 21, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 1, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jan 10, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 9, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 7, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Oct 6, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 4, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance