USPTO serial 87191306
YOUR COMPLIANCE ZONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YOUR COMPLIANCE ZONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michele Shuster
MICHELE SHUSTER MAC MURRAY, PETERSEN & SHUSTER LLP6530 WEST CAMPUS OVAL, SUITE 210NEW ALBANY, OH 43054UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business assistance, advisory and consulting services in the field of state mandated regulatory compliance | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2018 | PCBM | PETITION TO DIRECTOR WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 7, 2018 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |