CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for GUIDANCE

USPTO serial 87191374

GUIDANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GUIDANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew D. Dorisio

ANDREW D DORISIO KING & SCHICKLI PLLC800 CORPORATE DRIVESUITE 200LEXINGTON, KY 40503

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Animal control services, namely, animal herdingACTIVEApr 29, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 17, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 17, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 15, 2018EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 18, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 18, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 16, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 3, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 2, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 2, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 2, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 21, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2017RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Dec 19, 2017RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2017RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Dec 11, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 30, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 15, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 11, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2016TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Oct 14, 2016PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance