Drawing for BUSINESS CARE

USPTO serial 87192237

BUSINESS CARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHANG, ELIZABETH YI HSUAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUSINESS CARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David H. Chervitz

DAVID H CHERVITZ DAVID H CHERVITZ ESQ458 WHITESTONE FARM DRIVECHESTERFIELD, MO 63017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
045Legal services, namely, providing, for a fixed annual fee, bi-annual meetings with clients, unlimited calls from clients on new matters, and serving as a registered agentACTIVEOct 3, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 16, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 16, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 1, 2019EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 23, 2019RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Dec 4, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 5, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 5, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 5, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 25, 2018RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Jul 25, 2018RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2018RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Jul 6, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 8, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 8, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 7, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 7, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 10, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 11, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance