Drawing for VOIT

USPTO serial 87192769

VOIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZIMMERMAN, GAYNNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VOIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Felipe Rubio

FELIPE RUBIO RUBIO & ASSOCIATES8950 SW 74TH CT. SUITE 1804MIAMI, FL 33156UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009(Based on Use in Commerce) Goggles for sports; Spectacle cords; Spectacle frames; Spectacle lenses; Chains for spectacles; Frames for spectacles; Sports glassesACTIVEJan 1, 2016
024(Based on Intent to Use) TowelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 27, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 23, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 23, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 5, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 27, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 7, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 19, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 24, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 24, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 24, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance