USPTO serial 87193081
WATT.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WATT.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, pants, coats, dresses, tops and bottoms; footwear and headwear; swimwear; sportswear, namely, athletic shorts, athletic pants, athletic shirts, athletic uniforms; leisurewear, namely, robes, night gowns, leisure suits, leisure shoes, loungewear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 29, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 28, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 20, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 17, 2022 | KSNS | NOTICE OF SUSPENSION EMAILED - ADMIN REVIEW | — |
| May 17, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2022 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2022 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 29, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |