USPTO serial 87193353
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $3,250
Mayville Engineering Company, Inc.
Mayville, WI, US
Other trademarks owned by Mayville Engineering Company, Inc.
Mayville Engineering Company, Inc.
Mayville, WI, US
Other trademarks owned by Mayville Engineering Company, Inc.
Mayville Engineering Company, Inc.
Mayville, WI, US
Other trademarks owned by Mayville Engineering Company, Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine P. Califa
Katherine P. Califa FOLEY & LARDNER LLP3000 K Street, N.W., Suite 600Washington, DC 20007-5109UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 013 | Shotshell wads; metallic reloading presses for bullets and cartridges; ammunition case preparation and cleaning products, accessories and parts for same, namely, bullet pullers, shell holder trays, reloading trays, press trays, bullet feeders, case feeders, case collators, primer feeders, primer catcher, gun powder bushings, gun powder bushing racks; tumblers, namely, vibratory devices that clean cartridges after firing; rotary case tumbler, namely, device that cleans cases for reloading; rotary sifter, sorter, and separator for sorting and separating ammunition cases; powder trickler; powder measure; reloading press base and mounts; powder funnels; ammunition press dust covers; hand priming tool specially adapted for reloading ammunition; ammunition turret press; cartridge dies; cartridge die bushings; shotshell box fillers; shotshell reloaders; shotshell case conditioners, namely, shell reshaping tools, deprimer, shotshell trimmers, shotshell checkers; clay target throwing machines accessories, namely, firearm shooting stations and firearm shooting stands | ACTIVE | Mar 22, 1958 |
| 028 | Target launchers for clay pigeon shooting; electronic controls for target launchers for clay pigeon shooting; accessories and parts for target launchers for clay pigeon shooting, namely, pull cords for clay target launchers, carousel covers, panel mounts, motor covers; target launchers for clay pigeon shooting sold as a unit with shooting stations, shooting stands and shooting range signs | ACTIVE | Mar 22, 1958 |
| 037 | applying paint and enamel to metal parts and assemblies | ACTIVE | Mar 22, 1958 |
| 040 | Contract manufacturing services, namely, custom manufacturing and fabrication of metal parts including metal stamping and machining, assembling of metal parts into completed assemblies and sub-assemblies; custom manufacturing and fabrication of metal fuel and air tank products; custom manufacturing and fabrication of large and small diameter metal tube products | ACTIVE | Mar 22, 1958 |
| 042 | Design engineering services | ACTIVE | Mar 22, 1958 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 7, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 11, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 25, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2017 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 6, 2017 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 6, 2017 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 5, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 23, 2017 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 5, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |