USPTO serial 87193644
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert A. Nissen
ROBERT A. NISSEN NISSEN PATENT LAW#200, 10328 81 AVENUEEDMONTON, ALBERTA, T6E1X2CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for access to an on-line marketplace for buyers and sellers of goods and services; computer software for access to an on-line marketplace for buyers and sellers of goods and services; computer application software for mobile phones, handheld computers, portable computers, home computers, namely, software for access to an on-line marketplace for buyers and sellers of goods and services; e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; downloadable mobile applications for access to an on-line marketplace for buyers and sellers of goods and services and providing goods available for sale to consumers via an on-line marketplace | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Providing a searchable website featuring the goods and services of other vendors; auction management services provided to others over an on-line web site accessed through a global computer network; on-line auction services; computerized on-line retail store services in the field of general consumer merchandise; computerized on-line ordering services in the field of general consumer merchandise; online retail services through direct solicitation by salespersons or distributors directed to end-users featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others; Operating on-line marketplaces for sellers and buyers of goods or services; advertising on the Internet for others; advertising the goods and services of others via electronic media and specifically the internet; provision of advertising space by electronic means and global information networks; providing a searchable on-line website featuring consumer product information of the goods and services of other vendors via the Internet; providing information pertaining to the procurement, buying, selling and tendering information and opportunities relating to goods, and services, via computer, computer networks, telephone, the internet, mobile applications, or electronic mail; electronic commerce services, namely, providing information about products or events via telecommunication networks for advertising and sales purposes; marketing, advertising, and promoting the retail goods and services of others through wireless electronic devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | charitable fundraising services, namely, providing a marketplace where vendors of goods and services can donate a portion of proceeds to charity; charitable fundraising services, namely, collection or facilitation of donations for charitable purposes; charitable fund raising | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |