Drawing for N-VISION THE POSSIBILITIES

USPTO serial 87194678

N-VISION THE POSSIBILITIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRODY, DANIEL S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with N-VISION THE POSSIBILITIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Geza C. Ziegler

GEZA C. ZIEGLER ZIEGLER IP LAW GROUP LLC55 GREENS FARMS ROADWESTPORT, CT 06880UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Helmets, namely, protective helmets including motorcycle helmets, snow mobile helmets, ski helmets, and helmets for military environments and applications; Displays and lenses for display, namely, heads up displays in the nature of transparent electronic displays for automotive, vehicle and aircraft use; fixed and helmet mounted transparent electronic displays for protective helmets including motorcycle helmets, snow mobile helmets, ski helmets, and helmets for military environments and applications, for use in providing navigational information; Visors and lenses for helmets, namely, visors for motorcycle helmets, snow mobile helmets, ski helmets, helmets for military environments and applications; mobile phones; wearable glasses and visors featuring transparent electronic displays onto which information and data can be projected and displayedACTIVE—
028Virtual reality wearable glasses, lenses for glasses, visors, head-mounted gear and headsets, all adapted for use in playing video gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 11, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 9, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 12, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 22, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 18, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 8, 2017ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 8, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance