Drawing for COLORFIL

USPTO serial 87194938

COLORFIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLORFIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marsha Stolt,

Marsha Stolt, MOSS & BARNETT, P.A.150 SOUTH FIFTH STREETSUITE 1200MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Filtration media, namely, an emergency chemical sorbent for chemical vapors and gasesACTIVE—
007Air filters for appliances in the nature of vacuum cleaners, composters, trash compactors, waste compactorsACTIVE—
009Non-medical respirators other than for artificial respiration and non-medical respiratory facemasks; air filters for automation equipment, namely, computers and copier machines; filters for non-medical respirators other than for artificial respiration and non-medical respiratory facemasksACTIVE—
010Respirators for artificial respiration and respiratory facemasks for medical purposes; air filters for medical ventilators; filters for respirators for artificial respiration and respiratory facemasks for medical purposesACTIVE—
011Standalone air purifier units; water filters; automotive cabin air filters for air conditioners in vehicle passenger compartments; air filters for appliances in the nature of refrigerators, range hoods, air conditioners, electric space heaters, air purifiers, dehumidifiers, humidifiersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 22, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 21, 2020EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 18, 2020EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 18, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 27, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 25, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 25, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 15, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 13, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 13, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 13, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 4, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2019NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 28, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 28, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 28, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 24, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 22, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 22, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 22, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 5, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 10, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 20, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 15, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 21, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 21, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 15, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance