Drawing for WAGONBAGS EST. 2015

USPTO serial 87195387

WAGONBAGS EST. 2015

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NOVAKOVIC, MIROSLAV
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WAGONBAGS EST. 2015?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leesa N. Weiss

LEESA N. WEISS JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST., N.W.SUITE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018textile shopping bags; re-usable bag system consisting of textile shopping bags suitable for use in a shopping trolleyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 11, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 9, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 11, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 11, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 11, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 8, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 3, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 3, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 3, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 3, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 3, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 12, 2017AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 7, 2016PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2016MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance